Spectreofhell

So, have you ever wondered why so many porn producers spend all that screen time focused on a closeup of genitals? Me, too! Okay, so show us a close up to show that they're actually fucking, then pull back do show the full couple! Why the fuck use a beautiful actress or a hunk of an actor and then do nothing but focus on a cock plugging her pussy?

I'm also confused about the sequence of events. So, there's kissing, then he might finger her just a little, and then we have a ten minute blowjob. He might eat her next, and then back to blowjob, then fucking (with a close up on genitals most of the time), ending in him cumming on her face. The same "script" almost every time.

Remember how in classic porn movies the guy would pull out and cum all over the pussy or onto her stomach, her back, her ass, whatever. He pulled out to show that he came. He didn't have to coat her face with his spunk like he's marking his property.

You know what else bugs the fuck out of me? You watch a twenty minute video with fucking for seventeen of those minutes, then the guy has to jerk off for a full minute or more at the end to cum. Are you kidding me? Frankly, I'm amazed that they don't blow a nut five minutes in. It's incredible to hold back when you're fucking such beautiful women. In fact, I'd prefer to see that. One, maybe two position changes at the most, then he cums all over her pussy, or creampies her, or whatever. Then another scene where he fucks her again, maybe.

And plot! At least pretend to have one. There are so many videos out now that are just "here's the girl, watch her get fucked." Sometimes, that's enough. The girl is lovely and the fucking is nice, so okay. But seriously, it doesn't have to be incest for it to be a good set-up. The best ones present a basic premise at the beginning, and we can roll with that. Student fucks teacher for better grade. Lonely housewife seduces the repairman. Boss fucks his new secretary to "break her in." There's so much more porn producers can do! Why don't they?